BJH - volume 5, issue 4, december 2014
H. Helsmoortel PhD, T. Lammens PhD, N. Van Roy PhD, J. Philippé MD, PhD, P. De Paepe MD, PhD, Y Benoit MD, PhD, F. Speleman PhD, P. Van Vlierberghe PhD, B. De Moerloose MD, PhD
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia is a very rare, aggressive stem cell disorder predominantly affecting infants and young children. Current survival rates are disappointing and the only available curative therapy is haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Over the last years, intensive research efforts elucidated a plethora of molecular aberrations involved in the pathogenesis of juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia. Current investigations are mainly directed towards the complete unravelling of the molecular biology behind the disease in order to find more specific drugs. This review will focus on the diagnosis, genomic characterisation and the use of experimental therapies in juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia.
(BELG J HEMATOL 2014; 5(4): 119–24)
Read moreBJH - volume 5, issue 3, september 2014
J. Van Der Straeten MSc, B. De Moerloose MD, PhD, M-F. Dresse MD, PhD, S. Dupont MD, A. Ferster MD, PhD, P. Philippet MD, A. Uyttebroeck MD, PhD, J. van der Werff ten Bosch MD, PhD, C. Demanet MD, PhD, Y Benoit MD, PhD, M. Bakkus PhD
In Belgium approximately 70 children are diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia annually. For these children, the monitoring of minimal residual disease has an important prognostic value. The level of minimal residual disease during the first three months of therapy is used to recognise subgroups that differ substantially in outcome. Two techniques are used for minimal residual disease monitoring: the Genescan method and the allele specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction. The Genescan method is a less sensitive method (10−3) but is fast and less expensive. The allele specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction requires more time and budget but has a sensitivity of 10−4–10−5. Both techniques have proven their value in minimal residual disease monitoring in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
(BELG J HEMATOL 2014;5(3):81–8)
Read moreBJH - volume 5, issue Abstract Book BHS, january 2014
J. Van Der Straeten MSc, B. De Moerloose MD, PhD, M-F. Dresse MD, PhD, S. Dupont MD, A. Ferster MD, PhD, P. Philippet MD, A. Uyttebroeck MD, PhD, J. Van der Werf ten Bosch , C. Demanet MD, PhD, Y Benoit MD, PhD, M. Bakkus PhD
BJH - volume 4, issue 4, december 2013
V. Mondelaers MD, T. Bauters PharmD, PhD, B. De Moerloose MD, PhD, Y Benoit MD, PhD
Asparaginase is an essential compound of combination chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and adults. Essentially, three preparations of asparaginase are used in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: native Escherichia coli asparaginase, Erwinia chrysanthemi asparaginase and PEG-asparaginase. Although PEG-asparaginase seems to have some advantages over the other asparaginase preparations, its clinical use in Europe is limited to second-line therapy after allergic reactions to native asparaginase. This is in contrast to the United States, where PEG-asparaginase has been approved as first-line treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. This report describes the properties, clinical benefits and side effects of PEG-asparaginase.
(BELG J HEMATOL 2013;4(4): 138–143)
Read moreBJH - volume 4, issue 4, december 2013
T. Bauters PharmD, PhD, V. Mondelaers MD, B. De Moerloose MD, PhD, H. Robays PharmD, Y Benoit MD, PhD
PEG-L-Asparaginase (Oncaspar®) is a major compound of antineoplastic combination therapy for reinduction in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and adults with known hypersensitivity. In the United States, it has been approved for many years as first-line treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Its clinical benefits have been extensively described. In this report, a cost-minimisation analysis comparing the direct cost of PEG-L-asparaginase with that of native E. coli and Erwinia L-asparaginase treatment is described.
(BELG J HEMATOL 2013; 4(4): 144–147)
Read moreBJH - 2013, issue BHS Abstractbook, january 2013
J. Van der Meulen , K. Mavrakis , V. Sanghvi , B. Poppe , N. Van Roy PhD, P. Rondou , Y Benoit MD, PhD, P. Van Vlierberghe PhD, H. Wendel , F. Speleman PhD
BJH - 2013, issue BHS Abstractbook, january 2013
E. Mets , G. van Peer , J. Van der Meulen , P. Mestdagh , T. Taghon , D. Avran , Y Benoit MD, PhD, B. Poppe , J. Soulier , P. Van Vlierberghe PhD, P. Rondou , J. Vandesompele , F. Speleman PhD
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.